Announcement: OpenHoldem Immediate Availability - 2007-10-13

information and discussion about<br>
the annual pokerbot world championship

Postby indiana » 2007 Oct 22 Mon 8:31:28 am

Is this the end of winholdem or are you going to fight back?


It's absolutely the end, can't you see it? end.

Come'on ;)

I know well enterprises producing software for billions. There is a model (ref Geofrey moore) about core and context. You always need to find what is your core, that is where and how you differentiate, and what is your context. In the industry there is extreme amount of standartization, a lot of open source projects are simply adopted. Look at IBM eclipse open source dev tools platform, all vendors - bea, oracle, sap are going toward adopting ecplipse and deprecating their own tools.

So for me sayign WH died/will die is like a 2+2 mob statement "online poker died/will die because of bots".

What Ray can think of, is more formalized atittude toward OH (e.g. promise backward compatibility; provide internal docu etc. - these are positive examples of course).

Everyone should look much more to the opportunity that OH brings (as a great new product), insttead of WH being dead or not ...

P.S. On the earlier discussion how much botters are willing to contribute, I agree botting is special in this regard. But it comes back to the core/context question. The whole differentiator I have as a botter is my strategy (and to small extend on which sites i can play). therefore the framework itself I would like to have as better as possible and i'am willing to contribute to that, and I have no issue if it's good for others as well, as long as it is good for me. this is cotnext for me. my core is better bots.
But it has to be proven that this will work. With the wiki that i started, 95% of the content is from me. But there are guys that came already and contributed, some even went that far to write emails to mike caro and ask him for info and to contribute (this example is for the not so much known topic of Orac).

P.S.2. Current list of most wanted pages on the pokerbot-wiki:
Vexbot ‎(4 links)
PPRO ‎(4 links)
Exploitive play ‎(3 links)
E-Nash equilibrium ‎(3 links)
World Series of Poker ‎(2 links)
Winngy ‎(2 links)
Reference here ‎(2 links)
Aaron Davidson ‎(2 links)
Denis Papp ‎(2 links)
Nash Equilibrium ‎(2 links)
Martin Zinkevich ‎(2 links)
Last edited by indiana on 2007 Oct 22 Mon 12:28:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
indiana
Full House
 
Posts: 359
Joined: 2007 Aug 25 Sat 8:57:11 am
Location: Stuttgart

Postby support » 2007 Oct 22 Mon 9:29:25 am

matrix wrote:
diipadaapa wrote:Ray, have to ask this.

Is this the end of winholdem or are you going to fight back? Before it has been clear that WH is the best tool for botting, but now it isnt anymore, so IMO big things are needed from you if WH is going to stay alive.

Predicting the demise of WH is probably a little premature :-) WH is actually a package consisting of the bot engine, Bring, Winscrape and the Ppro server. Openholdem (OH) currently has just a beta version of a bot engine. It cannot work alone. I suspect the single most critical factor which will determine the relative success of the platforms is the availability of maintained scraper profiles (or equivalent) for each.

WH has suffered slightly in the last year because of the effort devoted by Support to the PBWC, which has meant that it is seen as being less well maintained and developed than in the past (when the support for it was excellent). This hopefully will no longer be the case. WH also has high visibility as a bot platform which can be levered to keep its market share.

Regards
M.


mat,

yes. here is a list (started by htc) of all the downloads accessible with a wh subscription:

http://forum.winholdem.net/wbb/viewtopic.php?t=4426



8)
The live game is owned by humans.
The online game is owned by humans with computers.
User avatar
support
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11722
Joined: 2004 Sep 23 Thu 12:07:14 pm
Location: US

Postby support » 2007 Oct 22 Mon 9:36:25 am

diipadaapa wrote:Ray, have to ask this.

Is this the end of winholdem or are you going to fight back? Before it has been clear that WH is the best tool for botting, but now it isnt anymore, so IMO big things are needed from you if WH is going to stay alive.


uh no. i don't think so.
http://forum.winholdem.net/wbb/viewtopic.php?t=12349

people were predicting the end of wh when opi first appeared and some of the wh heavyweights went over there. and now some of them are coming back here looking for something that can really win long term.


8)
The live game is owned by humans.
The online game is owned by humans with computers.
User avatar
support
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11722
Joined: 2004 Sep 23 Thu 12:07:14 pm
Location: US

Postby OpenHoldem » 2007 Oct 22 Mon 10:47:45 am

You'll notice that we have not posted here since our original Shakespearean announcement - that was because this is not our forum and we didn't want to make this a place to advertise OpenHoldem. However, given the discussion here, we felt it was necessary to make clear our whole philosophy and rationale for what we are doing.

Let us first say that Indiana has it nailed - the platform itself is not important. The bot logic that runs on the platform is what is going to make someone money or not. Releasing OpenHoldem to the public is not going to change that fact in any way. In reality, more people experimenting with OpenHoldem will provide for more poor bots out in the world that our better bots can take advantage of. Win!

Secondly, we wholeheartedly agree that competition is a good thing. The OH development team was inspired to develop our own platform primarily for reasons that have been stated a thousand times on this forum - development on WinHoldem was stagnating for a very long time, and many of us were afraid that it was going to be abandoned. We wanted to keep running our bots regardless of the state of WH. What if Ray decides to turn off his license server some day? Not saying he will, but if he does, we are all hosed. We wanted insurance against that possible event. Coincidence or not: OH is announced, Ray starts WH development again - you decide. Competition makes everyone better.

It is worth mentioning that, at this time, WinHoldem should clearly be the choice, if you want a stable, fully built out platform. Go to Max's forums and see for yourself - we are currently working through bugs that WH has had the last 3 (4?) years to get sorted out. OH is a beta engine/platform right now, as Matrix so kindly addressed, and that is it. There are a lot of supporting elements that are just not in place yet.

All of that said, we believe that the OH project has serious potential. Ray has one developer, we have between 3 and 8 (many don't want to be publicly known at this time, thus the big secret - sorry). It will not take us long to catch up and provide the whole universe of capabilities needed for a production botting platform. Specifically, the roadmap includes the following:

1. Continue working out bugs in the engine (thanks esp. to Matrix for his tireless help here)
2. Continue enhancing the core platform (usability / minor features / etc. )
3. Flesh out the universe with a WinScrape replacement, Manual mode replacement, and Bring replacement.
4. Continue extensive documentation of the internal workings of the platform, and general usability information
5. Continue major enhancements (i.e. fuzzy-OCR is in limited beta testing right now)

The major difference between OpenHoldem and OPI is that OH continues in the good tradition established by WinHoldem as a fully programmable poker bot engine. OPI never had that. It was a limited programmable engine at best. That is why OH is a viable option for this community.

OpenHoldem caters to the tinkerer. It caters to those who want to know how things work. It is for those who want to contribute, not just be passive observers. It is for those who feel comfort in having a full copy of the source code at their disposal in case anything goes wrong. It is for those who want to take the source code and make something of their own. It is for those who want to make the infrastructure better for everybody, understanding that that is better for them in the long run.

OpenHoldem is an alternative, not a replacement. We all lose if Ray stops developing/supporting WinHoldem.
OpenHoldem - the next step
http://code.google.com/p/openholdembot/
OpenHoldem
High Card
 
Posts: 3
Joined: 2007 Oct 11 Thu 2:02:48 pm

Postby diipadaapa » 2008 Jun 10 Tue 8:30:06 pm

support wrote:
diipadaapa wrote:Ray, have to ask this.

Is this the end of winholdem or are you going to fight back? Before it has been clear that WH is the best tool for botting, but now it isnt anymore, so IMO big things are needed from you if WH is going to stay alive.


uh no. i don't think so.
http://forum.winholdem.net/wbb/viewtopic.php?t=12349

people were predicting the end of wh when opi first appeared and some of the wh heavyweights went over there. and now some of them are coming back here looking for something that can really win long term.


8)


Support, Any thoughts about this after over 6 months?
diipadaapa
Full House
 
Posts: 259
Joined: 2007 Apr 02 Mon 1:59:57 am

Postby diipadaapa » 2008 Nov 30 Sun 8:43:23 am

diipadaapa wrote:
support wrote:
diipadaapa wrote:Ray, have to ask this.

Is this the end of winholdem or are you going to fight back? Before it has been clear that WH is the best tool for botting, but now it isnt anymore, so IMO big things are needed from you if WH is going to stay alive.


uh no. i don't think so.
http://forum.winholdem.net/wbb/viewtopic.php?t=12349

people were predicting the end of wh when opi first appeared and some of the wh heavyweights went over there. and now some of them are coming back here looking for something that can really win long term.


8)


Support, Any thoughts about this after over 6 months?


About 6 months again and this place is dead.. Any thoughts now?
diipadaapa
Full House
 
Posts: 259
Joined: 2007 Apr 02 Mon 1:59:57 am

Postby support » 2008 Nov 30 Sun 1:19:02 pm

exactly what type of response are you looking for here?

it's not like we can "force" people to post here. they do what they want.

it is what it is.

8)
The live game is owned by humans.
The online game is owned by humans with computers.
User avatar
support
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11722
Joined: 2004 Sep 23 Thu 12:07:14 pm
Location: US

Postby htc » 2008 Dec 02 Tue 11:45:42 am

i'll be back when i get a decent damn internet connection again one day, just don't wanna talk to gekko only seems he won't reply to me when i remark in his "queer" threads.

HTC - PokerBot World Champion 3 events one 1st one solid second and another second to the woman i was sleeping w/ @ the time :shock: .
The more skillful the gambler, the worse the man.
-Publilius Syrus (~100 BC)
Image-and skillful the bot. -htc (~2000 AD)
User avatar
htc
Royal Flush
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: 2004 Dec 01 Wed 7:07:23 pm
Location: the styx

Postby support » 2008 Dec 02 Tue 3:21:36 pm

htc wrote:...
HTC - PokerBot World Champion 3 events one 1st one solid second and another second to the woman i was sleeping w/ @ the time :shock: .


LOL!

8)
The live game is owned by humans.
The online game is owned by humans with computers.
User avatar
support
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11722
Joined: 2004 Sep 23 Thu 12:07:14 pm
Location: US

Previous

Return to PokerBot World Championship

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron